Darwin’s “Tree of Life” Needs Pruning!

Darwin’s so-called “Tree of Life”shows how species are supposedly related through evolutionary history has some fundamental problems. His thesis is plagued by an outright lack of hard evidence. Scientists are so taken away with his conclusions that the science community observes almost all science through its dribble!

For instance take the fossil record. Darwin actually didn’t even support the idea of so-called “transitional fossils”, although at the time he was certain that science would one day come up with examples…the clock is still running as his publication, “On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life” (quite a racist title don’t you think?). That publication was dated 160 years ago and we are still waiting for an array of transitional fossils!

Enter the Cambrian Explosion. According to science, the Cambrian Explosion is like a Big Bang in evolution. There were new fully formed life-form without transitional fossils evident! The Cambrian Explosion according to science happened roughly (according to flawed carbon dating) 25 million Years ago. The life forms were determined by science to be classified as static (stasis), described as having no evolutionary change. They just arrived!

This is just another way to shut God out of the classroom. We have a wonderful creator who said “Let us make man in our image, in our likeness”! Darwin’s theory does not even come close to detailing the origin of the universe, or any other type of macroevolutionary science. Philosophical Naturalism is bad science. Good science will follow the facts to where they take you.

The only viable answer is a Creator God!

Psalm 148: 1-6

“Praise the Lord! Praise the Lord from the heavens; Praise Him in the heights! Praise Him, all His angels; Praise Him, all His hosts! Praise Him, sun and moon; Praise Him, all stars of light! Praise Him, highest heavens, And the waters that are above the heavens! Let them praise the name of the Lord, For He commanded and they were created. He has also established them forever and ever; He has made a decree which will not pass away” 

God Bless

Brian Mason

The “Lucy” Fraud (Joke) Revisited From Wretched TV

How low will evolutionary ahem, scientists go to prove Darwinian Evolution?

God Bless

Brian Mason

Am I Wrong About Macroevolution?

Yes, there has been some feathers ruffled by some of my last statements about the fraud called “Macro-Evolution” I honestly believe that if you think we as the human race et al. “evolved” from apes, then you need to be re-educated. I know that it sounds crazy, but you have likely been indoctrinated into secularism. You will not care as you do not have to be accountable as your post-modernism will state that “it is okay as long as you think it is okay and who am I to say you are wrong?” You are brainwashed! Please give me my airsick bag! BTW There is not one stitch of evidence confirming “one kind” evolving into “another kind” so Charlie D was wrong!

A great book to read would be 1984~ George Orwell!

God Bless

Brian Mason

Goodbye Darwinism!

The following comes from Science News Online:

Scientists analyzing fragments of a Tyrannosaurus rex’s leg bone have recovered pliable material containing structures that appear to be cells and blood vessels.
Paleontologists usually find only a creature’s hard body parts, such as bones, teeth, or shells, preserved as fossils. In the rare instances when internal organs, muscles, skin, and other soft body parts turn up, the original tissue has been replaced by minerals that create hard replicas, says Mary H. Schweitzer, a paleontologist at North Carolina State University in Raleigh. Sometimes, a soft tissue’s shape is recorded by sediments that surround it.
Now, the first report of flexible material from a fossil describes an extraction from the femur, or upper leg bone, of a T. rex that lived about 68 million years ago in what is now Montana.
The researchers dissolved minerals from the fossil by soaking it in a series of slightly alkaline solutions. After a week, much of the remaining material was surprisingly soft and pliable, say the researchers. Many parts of the remains were translucent and fibrous, and they retained their elasticity after repeated cycles of dehydration and rehydration. Schweitzer and her colleagues report their findings in the March 25 Science.
Some stretchy, translucent samples were high in carbon and appeared to be part of a network of blood vessels, says Schweitzer. Similar demineralization experiments on modern-day ostrich bones—with an added step required to digest the collagen strengthening those bones—yielded blood vessels of a similar size and texture, she reports.
The researchers squeezed round, microscopic structures out of the presumed T. rex blood vessels. Those small spheres, which ranged from dark red to deep brown, may be red blood cells, says Schweitzer.
Also, some fibrous remains contained small, elongated features that look like cells called osteocytes, which are found in mature bones.
Finally, a spongy material extracted from the bones triggered a chemical response in tests to detect proteins commonly found in bones of modern chickens and cows.
Using the extraction technique, Schweitzer and her colleagues subsequently recovered what appear to be blood vessels and osteocytes from two other well-preserved specimens of T. rex. They’ve also obtained osteocytes from an 80-million-year-old hadrosaur, a plant-eating dinosaur.
The state of preservation noted in the new study is “improbable but obviously not impossible,” says Cameron J. Tsujita, a paleontologist at the University of Western Ontario in London. The osteocytes are “dead ringers” for those present in living vertebrates, he notes. As for the purported blood cells, he says that he “can’t really think of what else they could be.”
This is a “totally novel discovery,” says Derek E.G. Briggs, a paleontologist at Yale University. The tissue preservation that Schweitzer’s team has described may be more commonplace than scientists might expect, he says.
Additional analyses of the T. rex fossils, as well as of material from other specimens, could provide insight into the early stages of fossilization, says Briggs. Such information may also reveal new details of dinosaur physiology and metabolism.
Schweitzer, M.H., et al. 2005. Soft-tissue vessels and cellular preservation inTyrannosaurus rex. Science 307(March 25):1952–1955. Abstract available athttp://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1108397.

Protein Molecules simply do not last “Millions of Years”!

These animals were NOT millions of years old.

Evolution on a Macro scale does not exist!

Good Night Charles!

God Bless

Brian Mason